Sister Sites

MRQ Casino Sister Sites: Operator Facts and Five UK Alternatives

MRQ has no additional sister sites confirmed by its UK operator record. Compare five separately operated alternatives and their features.

MRQ Casino Sister Sites

1

Casumo

5.0

50% deposit match up to £100 or 100% up to £100 + 50 spins

Payout
0-24h
Min dep
£20
2

Betway

5.0

150 Free Spins on £20 Deposit

Payout
0-24 hrs
Min dep
£10
3

Mr Green

4.9

200 Free Spins on £10 Deposit

Payout
0-24 hrs
Min dep
£10
4

888 Casino

4.9

100% Up to £100 + 100 Free Spins

Payout
0-24 hrs
Min dep
£9
5

William Hill

4.9

200 Free Spins on £10 Deposit

Payout
0-24 hrs
Min dep
£10
6

Betfred Casino

4.8

Up to 200 Free Spins on £10 Deposit

Payout
0-3 hrs
Min dep
£10
7

Paddy Power

4.8

60 Free Spins No Deposit + 200 Free Spins

Payout
0-24 hrs
Min dep
£10
8

PokerStars Casino

4.8

100% Up to £500 + 50 Free Spins

Payout
0-24 hrs
Min dep
£19
9

BetVictor

4.7

£20 Bonus + 50 Free Spins on £10

Payout
0-24 hrs
Min dep
£10
10

Sky Vegas

4.7

50 Free Spins No Deposit + 200 Free Spins

Payout
0-24 hrs
Min dep
£9
11

BetMGM UK

4.7

200 Free Spins on £10 Deposit

Payout
0-24 hrs
Min dep
£10
12

Coral Casino

4.6

100 Free Spins on £10 Deposit

Payout
0-24 hrs
Min dep
£10
13

PlayOJO

4.6

80 Free Spins No Wagering

Payout
0-24 hrs
Min dep
£10
14

Unibet

4.6

200 Free Spins on £10 Deposit

Payout
0-12 hrs
Min dep
£10
15

Jackpotjoy

4.5

50 Free Spins on £10 Deposit

Payout
0-24 hrs
Min dep
£10
16

Grosvenor Casinos

4.6

£40 bonus + 100 free spins on a £20 deposit

Payout
24–48 hours
Min dep
£20

Brand comparison

Compare MRQ Casino with reviewed UK casinos

Scan a short selection of operator, bonus and payment details before reading the page-specific sister-site evidence below.

CasinoOperatorRatingMin depositPayoutBest use
PokerStars CasinoIndependent operator4.8/5£190-24 hrsFree-spins comparison
William HillWilliam Hill4.9/5£100-24 hrsFree-spins comparison
Paddy PowerIndependent operator4.8/5£100-24 hrsFree-spins comparison
BetMGM UKLeoVegas Gaming PLC4.7/5£100-24 hrsFree-spins comparison
UnibetIndependent operator4.6/5£100-12 hrsFree-spins comparison

MRQ casino sister sites at a glance

MRQ Casino Sister Sites: Operator Facts and Five UK Alternatives section 1 image

MRQ has no additional sister sites confirmed by its current UK operator record. Tek Fox Ltd operates MRQ under Gambling Commission account 60629, which lists only www.mrq.com as an active domain. There is therefore no additional same-licence MRQ sister site to name from that record.

PlayOJO, Casumo, Buzz Bingo, Grosvenor Casino and BetVictor are alternatives, with their own operators and product features. None of these five is presented here as a confirmed member of MRQ's corporate family. Their relevance comes from no-wagering rewards, bingo, slots or live casino, depending on the brand.

For readers searching for MRQ sister sites, the sections below separate that ownership answer from the product comparison. Each casino has its own profile, followed by the details of MRQ's rewards, games and account terms that help explain the differences.

Does MRQ have any confirmed UK sister sites?

The current Tek Fox domain register lists MRQ alone. It does not provide a wider collection of active casino brands or a separate group of white-label sites to compare under the same operating account.

This is a specific answer about the published UK record. It does not establish every possible investment or corporate relationship involving the business. A claim about a broader parent-company connection would need separate evidence identifying the other brand and how it is related.

For readers searching for MRQ casino sister sites, the distinction prevents a common misunderstanding: a page can show several casino recommendations without demonstrating that any of them share MRQ's operator. Similar games, branding or promotions are product details, not ownership evidence.

Our wider sister-sites directory covers brands with different kinds of connections. MRQ's answer is more limited than a large operator network, and it is more useful to state that plainly than to manufacture a family of casinos from unrelated recommendations.

Who operates MRQ?

MRQ's general terms identify Tek Fox Ltd as the company operating and managing the website. It is incorporated in Malta under registration number C96152 and names UK Gambling Commission account 60629 for its service to customers in Great Britain.

MRQ is the name customers see; Tek Fox is the legal company behind it. These are two names for the brand and its operator, rather than two separate casinos. MRQ's mobile browser service is another way to use the same website and account.

The five alternatives below have separate operating identities: SkillOnNet for PlayOJO, Recro Limited for Casumo, Buzz Bingo Digital Limited for Buzz Bingo, Rank Interactive (Gibraltar) Limited for Grosvenor's online casino and BV Gaming Limited for BetVictor in Great Britain.

PlayOJO: a separately operated alternative

PlayOJO is a separately operated casino whose published UK rewards share one feature with MRQ: no wagering on free-spin winnings. Its operator is Skill On Net Limited, rather than Tek Fox Ltd, so it belongs here as a product alternative rather than a confirmed MRQ sister brand.

Its own reward offering includes OJOplus, described as money back on play, as well as daily reward games. Those features give PlayOJO an identity beyond its first-deposit promotion. They also have their own eligibility conditions, rather than forming a reward package that every account receives automatically.

PlayOJO's published game categories include slots, live casino, table games and bingo. This provides several areas of overlap with MRQ, although matching categories do not establish identical game catalogues or shared account access. The specific service and its terms remain separate.

Our PlayOJO sister-sites guide explains its official OJO/UZU family and the wider SkillOnNet connections. For readers interested in an MRQ alternative, PlayOJO's relevant features are its advertised cash treatment of promotional winnings and its range of game formats. The operator evidence does not connect it to MRQ's licence.

Casumo: slots and live casino

MRQ Casino Sister Sites: Operator Facts and Five UK Alternatives section 5 image

Casumo combines slots, table games and live dealers with a distinctive illustrated presentation. Its own About page describes the brand's colourful setting and identifies exclusive games such as Casumo Bonanza. That gives it a different visual identity from MRQ even where the two services carry similar types of games.

The product range also extends to sports betting, with a dedicated sportsbook. For this comparison, its casino categories are the relevant overlap with MRQ; the presence of a sportsbook is an additional feature, rather than evidence that either casino has the same customer experience.

Casumo's active UK domain record is held by Recro Limited under account 61549. Older references to Casumo Services Limited point to a different record where the domain is marked inactive. The current record should be used when identifying its British operator.

Casumo belongs in this article as a separately operated alternative for slots and live games. Its inclusion does not mean its promotional winnings follow MRQ's no-wagering model. Its rewards have their own terms, and no claim about equivalent bonuses or withdrawal performance is implied by the game comparison.

Buzz Bingo: an alternative for bingo players

Buzz Bingo gives this comparison a dedicated bingo brand, supported by an online service and a separate network of physical clubs. Its official material covers online bingo variations and branded games, while its club pages describe the in-person side of the business. That bingo identity is its main point of relevance for someone researching MRQ's rooms.

The online service at buzzbingo.com is operated by Buzz Bingo Digital Limited under Gambling Commission account 57594. That account also lists buzzcasino.com as active. These are Buzz's own recorded connections; they do not connect either website to MRQ or Tek Fox.

The retail clubs use a different legal operator, Buzz Group Limited. A familiar name across a club and a website should therefore not be taken as proof that account balances, membership benefits or promotions work in both places.

Buzz Bingo offers a different brand setting for bingo research. Its room formats, session times and ticket conditions need to fit the particular game being compared. An online bingo reward should also be distinguished from an offer intended for a visit to a physical club.

Grosvenor Casino: live tables and a venue connection

Grosvenor Casino's online offering gives live tables a prominent place alongside slots, poker, sports and other casino games. Its published live lobby includes branded Grosvenor roulette and blackjack tables, as well as auto roulette. This makes its dealer-led games a concrete point of comparison with MRQ's live casino.

A distinctive part of the lobby is its Dual Play roulette selection, with tables named for physical venues including Nottingham, Sheffield and Glasgow. These named venue connections give the product a different setting from a comparison based only on a shared slot provider. They should not be confused with a promise that every online game is streamed from a Grosvenor club.

The online casino's operator is Rank Interactive (Gibraltar) Limited, under account 57924. Its active domain record includes grosvenorcasinos.com and meccabingo.com. Our Rank Group network guide explains that separate family of brands.

For this MRQ comparison, Grosvenor's relevant distinction is its published live-table range and venue-linked presentation. It is an alternative with a Rank connection, rather than a Tek Fox sister casino. The games and account conditions belong to its own service.

BetVictor: casino games alongside a sportsbook

BetVictor brings casino, live casino and sports betting into the same wider brand offering. Its casino navigation separates slots, jackpots, instant-win games and tables, giving readers several product categories to explore beyond a single welcome promotion.

The published table selection includes titles such as Go Craps, 10p Roulette, 3 Card Brag and Multihand Blackjack. These examples describe the catalogue at the time of review; they do not establish the minimum stake for every game or a permanent promise that each title will remain available.

For customers in Great Britain, the website names BV Gaming Limited and Gambling Commission account 39576. That operating identity is separate from MRQ's Tek Fox record. References to other BetVictor companies serving other markets should not be substituted for the British operator when making this comparison.

BetVictor's profile here focuses on the combination of casino categories and a prominent sportsbook. Someone researching MRQ's slots or table games can compare those parts of the offering without assuming a common rewards scheme. BetVictor is not presented as matching MRQ's no-wagering promotions, and its inclusion does not establish shared account access.

MRQ's no-wagering approach: the feature to compare first

MRQ describes itself as a no-wagering casino, with winnings paid in cash. That is one of the clearest reasons to compare its product with another service: the treatment of promotional winnings can matter more than the headline number of free spins.

No wagering means the reward is not tied to a further play-through requirement of that kind. It does not remove all eligibility rules. MRQ's Fair Use Policy still addresses matters such as offers intended for particular accounts and the creation of multiple accounts to claim a reward more than once.

For a useful comparison, separate three questions. What must you do to qualify? What game or activity can the reward be used on?

What happens to any winnings? Answering those questions makes two offers easier to compare even when their headline amounts are different.

Consider a hypothetical offer of 50 spins worth 10p each. That represents £5 in nominal stakes, not £5 of guaranteed winnings. Doubling the number of spins doubles that nominal stake value, but it does not establish a predictable return. The game, expiry and qualifying requirements still belong in the comparison.

Bingo at MRQ and how to compare another service

MRQ's About page describes 75-ball and 90-ball bingo and names rooms including Pinch a Penny, Cheap as Chips, Tropic Like It's Hot and On The House. That makes bingo a concrete part of the product comparison, rather than an assumption based on the casino's name.

A useful bingo comparison starts with the room and session. Consider the game format, when it runs, what tickets cost and which rewards apply to it. A casino's total slot count says little about whether its bingo schedule suits the activity you are researching.

Slots, Slingo and live games: compare the actual format

MRQ's published catalogue spans several types of casino entertainment. Its mobile page lists slots such as Big Bass Splash and Fishin' Frenzy, alongside live games including Crazy Time, Lightning Roulette and Infinite Blackjack. Its About page also describes Slingo.

Those categories provide more useful starting points than a generic claim that another casino has more games. If you are looking for one slot, compare the full title and version. Similar artwork can appear across a series with different features, and a jackpot edition may be a different product from the original release.

Slingo deserves its own comparison. A numbered grid with reels is not the same experience as joining a scheduled bingo room, even though both use numbers and completed lines. Someone who enjoys one format may be looking for a particular mechanic rather than more games carrying a familiar theme.

For live casino, decide whether the comparison concerns a conventional table or a game show. Dealer presentation, available stakes and game rules can all matter. The shared presence of one well-known provider does not establish identical lobbies, and it certainly does not establish common casino ownership.

What MRQ's current free-spin offer actually says

At the time of this review, MRQ's promotions page advertises 100 spins after a first £10 deposit, restricted to Big Bass Splash. Each spin is worth 10p, the spins must be used within 48 hours of qualifying, and the page says winnings are uncapped and credited to the real-money balance.

Those details are more useful than the number 100 on its own. The reward is linked to a first deposit and one named game, and excludes customers in Northern Ireland. The 48-hour window affects when it can be used, while the cash treatment explains what happens to winnings. The offer's terms also restrict it to intended recipients.

For someone who already has an MRQ account, this is not automatically an available reward. A first-deposit offer describes a particular qualifying event, rather than a benefit that can be claimed repeatedly. Existing-customer promotions need to be read separately.

MRQ's promotions page also distinguishes recurring features from its welcome offer. That is the right way to compare rewards: keep first-deposit spins, invitation-based offers and other promotions separate, rather than adding them together into a package that no single account is guaranteed to receive.

MRQ's withdrawal guarantee: processing versus bank arrival

MRQ advertises an instant-withdrawal guarantee, but its detailed terms define the commitment more precisely: processing within 60 seconds of the request. An eligible failure can result in a £10 cash credit, limited to one credit per player per calendar day.

The terms exclude specified situations, including verification holds, certain account breaches, some payment-method issues and technical or third-party disruptions. They also distinguish MRQ's processing from the time the bank takes to complete the transfer. The detailed wording says an eligible credit is made within one business day.

That distinction matters when comparing casinos. “Processed in a minute” and “available in your bank in a minute” are different claims. A comparison should use the same measure for both services, rather than placing one operator's processing promise beside another's end-to-end estimate.

We have not completed a withdrawal test, so this is an explanation of MRQ's published guarantee, not an independently measured speed result. Its older withdrawal guide contains different method-specific estimates. The current guarantee terms are therefore the better source for explaining that particular promotion.

Accounts and verification at MRQ

The MRQ account terms allow one account per person and require payment methods to belong to the account holder. They also explain that identity and other checks can be required during the account relationship. A no-wagering promotion does not remove those account requirements.

If you have forgotten your login, account recovery is the appropriate route. Creating another account on a different device does not turn it into a sister-site account. MRQ's terms explicitly treat opening a fresh account after forgetting login details as a breach of its duplicate-account rules.

For someone comparing a different operator, completing checks at MRQ does not establish that the second service can skip its own process. Keep account access, identity checks and promotional eligibility distinct when reading a comparison; they concern different parts of the service.

If a review claims that two sites share an account, ask what the claim actually means. Shared marketing language, a similar cashier or common games do not answer that question. Our guide to checking casino connections explains the evidence needed to establish the underlying business relationship.

Choosing which MRQ features to compare

PlayOJO's advertised treatment of promotional winnings, Buzz Bingo's bingo focus, Casumo's casino presentation, Grosvenor's venue-linked live tables and BetVictor's combined casino and sports offering provide different reasons for comparison. None requires inventing a shared corporate family with MRQ.

If the search for another service concerns a restriction, an exclusion or gambling that no longer feels manageable, another brand is not a solution. Our responsible-gambling page points to support and tools for taking a break.

Related brand checks: compare MRQ with the PlayOJO sister-sites guide, the Virgin Games sister-sites article, and our UK bonus wagering requirements guide.

Written by

Daniella Clarke

Daniella Clarke

Senior Editor

Daniella Clarke oversees editorial quality across My Casino Sisters, checking that sister-site guides are clear, current and grounded in public operator evidence.

Active byline · Public-record research · Last verified August 2026

Frequently asked questions

How do I know if MRQ Casino Sister Sites: Operator Facts and Five UK Alternatives has real sister sites?

Look for matching operator names, licence details, trading-name records, terms wording and company information. Similar logos, bonuses or games can be clues, but they are not proof by themselves.

Should I open accounts at several sister casinos?

Only if the terms allow it and you are comfortable with the shared checks. Sister sites may connect duplicate-account rules, affordability checks, self-exclusion tools and bonus restrictions.

What matters more: the brand name or the operator?

For practical player checks, the operator and licence holder usually matter more than the front-end brand. They often control verification, withdrawals, complaints handling and safer-gambling procedures.